Elected officials can play a key role in facilitating access to safe, affordable, nutritious food through supportive public policies. Initiatives that promote urban agriculture, protect food safety and nutrition, and improve affordability and access to healthy food are crucial to ensure an equitable and sustainable food system for all New Yorkers. As part of the Center’s ongoing Food Policy for Breakfast series, we invited the Borough Presidents to Hunter College to join us for a discussion of food politics in their borough and across New York City. Our special guests, listed below, discussed the unique challenges of coordinating food policy, the role of nutrition education in schools, and top-down versus bottom-up approaches to policy making.
If you missed the event, you can watch the recording here.
Opening remarks: Jennifer Raab, President of Hunter College
Moderator: Charles Platkin, PhD, JD, MPH, executive director of the Hunter College NYC Food Policy Center
The Borough Presidents
- Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams
- Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer
- Staten Island Borough President James S. Oddo
- Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr.
The moderator, Charles Platkin, opened the session by asking the panelists to respond to the following statement: “There seem to be many interesting, smart and creative programs around food in NYC, including the first menu-labeling law, FRESH, Meatless Mondays and free breakfast and lunch for NYC public school students, but it doesn’t seem as if it is part of a master plan on food. There doesn’t seem to be any true coordination. Yes, of course, we have a food policy coordinator and the mayor’s office of food policy, but there still seems to be a lack of overall importance–a holistic, ecological program around food. It feels as though there is literally no coordination.” What do you think about this statement? Do you agree? Why isn’t there a master food plan?
Policy coordination is one of the oldest challenges for governments, and it has become even more important as the problems confronting governments change. It is no different for food policy here in New York City.
Eric L. Adams understands the challenges of coordination and agreed that the city’s efforts to create a healthier, more sustainable, equitable food system will take time.
“We are not there yet,” Adams said. “We are just starting to touch the surface, and whenever you do something new and move from knowledge to practice to being, it takes time….We need to be patient and move in the right direction.”
Gale Brewer, on the other hand, is a less patient. “It is disjointed. The question is how do we put it all together?”
Brewer highlighted the lack of coordination through the example of Local Law 50. In her efforts to advance food policy, Brewer Sponsored Local Law 50 of 2011 to amend the administrative code relating to the city’s purchase of New York state food with the goal of increasing the use of locally grown and regionally processed foods in New York City as part of the Speaker’s FoodWorks Initiative.
The initiative encourages (but does not mandate) City agencies including the Department of Education, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Aging, HeadStart, and others to buy from local producers in the region. “We all go to the farmers markets but the City of New York would also benefit from the fresh fruits and vegetables and so would the farmers. Unfortunately, purchasing locally is not happening the way it should,” Brewer said.
Like Brewer, Ruben Diaz is also frustrated by the lack of coordination in the administration. “When you speak of food and this wonderful city, there is so much that comes with that. Food is a driving force in our economy. Food is a job creator. Food is about health.”
The ways in which food intersects with other public policy issues adds another layer to the issue of coordination. Diaz offered a solution. “We need someone sitting in the city administration to look at food and coordinate it within jobs, development, tourism, education and bring it all together. When it is all said and done, there are so many boxes to check to keep New Yorkers healthy.”
For James Oddo it was less about coordination and more about individual awareness.
“Every day, we as a society allow big food to come in and pummel our kids and pummel the ones we love. A real part of this has to be holding up a mirror to let folks know what big food does to us in so many different ways. We have to tap into that anger I see out there, certainly in the political realm when people talk politics, certainly in the realm of sports, in the realm of entertainment. We have to tap into that anger and say ‘what you should really be angry about is what those folks in those corporations are trying to do, and this is what you need to do to prevent them from, as they’re harming you, taking money out of your pockets.”
What is the vision over the next three to five years? How do we change the outcome? Is the city empowered enough to make those changes? Is it possible to move the needle?
While the panelists may have agreed that coordination is a challenge, there was a strong sense of optimism about overcoming barriers in order to create change.
Adams highlighted the urgency and necessity of creating change not through short-term fixes but through systematic solutions that get to the core of the problem. “The Titanic is sinking and we can’t just move around deck chairs. We need to fix the hole.”
In Brooklyn, Adams and his administration are working with the Urban League, NAACP, ministers and leaders of different community groups to encourage citizens to adopt healthier eating within own culture. Why? Because healthy food is so much more than quinoa or kale or green juice. Food represents heritage, community and ancestry.
“You can’t force this one,” Adams added. “Food is not just what you put in your mouth. Food is how you define yourself.”
“It is cultural,” Diaz jumped in. “It is an identity.”
The Bronx is partnering with the NY Bodega Association and the Supermarket Association to bring celebrity chefs to supermarkets or to Baptist Churches to introduce people to new recipes and and help them enjoy healthy food without sacrificing taste. Diaz is also working to improve health outcomes in the Bronx, which was once ranked the least healthy county in New York State, through the “#Not62” Campaign aimed at promoting social and economic factors that would help to bring about more positive health behaviors among Bronx residents.
“And while we may still be placed 62, the Bronx is getting healthier and healthier each year when it is compared to itself. It can work. But we need to connect the dots and coordinate it all together.”
For Brewer, while the government may be empowered to make necessary changes, it needs to do a lot more. Increasing food accessibility and affordability are additional items on that to-do list. “Twenty-two supermarkets have closed in Manhattan since 2017. We need affordable supermarkets and not just Whole Check, also known as Whole Foods.” Grocery stories, which operate under a narrow 1 percent profit margin have been at risk of closure due to high commercial rent taxes.
To raise awareness on the issue, In 2017, Brewer issued a report entitled “Manhattan Supermarkets: How to Keep Them Alive,” with policy recommendations to stem the tide of supermarket closures.
What is the vision? What do you tell the city government? The bottom up approaches we have been discussing are critical, but how do you organize a city that has priorities and food is not one of them?
Making food policy decisions is not always a simple process, and there are various approaches to creating and implementing such policies. While top-down approaches encourage behavior change through policy, bottom-up approaches attempt the opposite: to influence policy through behavior.
“I know there is a desire to have a top-down visionary leadership, but the reality is that it is going to be bottom up. That is what it is going to take,” said Adams.
Adams, who was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 2016, switched to a plant-based, whole food diet and, consequently, lost 30 pounds and reversed his diabetes diagnosis. He has used his own life experience to encourage others to be proactive about their own health and diet.
“I know what it is like to wake up [in the morning] and you can’t see [the alarm clock]. You lost your sight because of diabetes and then you see it reversed because you ate right. Chronic diseases hijack your life and we need to have a real conversation around it.”
He has campaigned for funding to launch the pilot Plant-Based Lifestyle Medicine program, which includes a clinic at Bellevue Hospital to serve as a resource for adult patients with chronic disease who want to improve their health through lifestyle changes.
Diaz agrees. “It starts with us. It does and it has. We have proven we can get results.”
The Bronx has succeeded in recruiting private partners to play a role in community development. “When FreshDirect wanted to move from Long Island City to the Bronx, one of the things we bargained for was to make their food available to EBT card holders,” Diaz said.
Diaz also spearheaded New York State’s participation in a nationwide pilot program that allows Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants to purchase their groceries online. Prior to this program, which is now being tested in six states, EBT card=holders could not purchase anything online.
For Brewer, it is a mix. “You do have to have some of the bottom up. It would be nice to have a top-down approach, but we do not have any time to wait.” She voiced her frustrations with the Department of Education. “There is no one really in charge of food right now. If you gave the job to a wellness coordinator in a school or to a similar organization, you would get done what is necessary.”
“It does comes from the top eventually, but it comes from the top when the people on the ground level kick and scream and make such a noise that the top has to begin to listen,” Oddo added.
What about having food policy and nutrition education in our schools? Is that a solution to creating a bottom-up approach?
Nutrition education in schools is well recognized as an important piece of the solution. However, federal policy and education curriculum mandates can slow down progress. Fortunately, the borough presidents are working to address those challenges.
“There is no reason why our children can’t learn math by saying one apple plus two apples minus steak equals health or learn geography by understanding where certain foods come from.” Adams said. “We can’t wait for the legislative body in Albany to get past the lobbyists who are trying to prevent this information from coming into schools.”
For Oddo, one class or semester will not create the desired (and necessary) results.
“One of the things that came out of our conversations in trying to get a curriculum in schools on the opioid front, if you are in high school you have eight semesters with only one semester with a health class that covers forty-five topics. If you are in middle school, you have one semester on health issues. So yeah, there should be a curriculum.”
Oddo has embraced a broad health and wellness agenda that includes diabetes reduction and prevention, addressing childhood obesity, advocating for a comprehensive approach to disease prevention for children K through 8th grade, launching an anti-sugary drinks campaign in grammar, middle and high schools, campaigning for increased access to healthy foods and many other initiatives.
Brewer brought up a different perspective on the issue of education in schools. It was not a lack of classes but rather a lack of data on those classes.
“I am the author of the Open Data Bill and we do not have the data.” The bill, now pending approval, will mandate every school to collect and report school-based food and nutritional education data. “Without that, you do not have the information to use as a weapon to say we need this, this, and this. The data is needed.”
What about a wellness coordinator in each public school?
Adams voiced his immediate support for a wellness coordinator in schools.
“When you have a wellness coordinator that is going to look at the full aspects, you are going to put [students] in a starting point to absorb the educational experience but also start the process of healing…My goal is for every child in Brooklyn to start their day meditating and prepare to move into their day.”
Brooklyn is working to send teachers to wellness, yoga and mindfulness training programs. Earlier this month, Adams announced the launch of a pilot program to bring the practice of mindfulness, meditation and yoga to East Brooklyn schools, and eventually, to institutions across the borough.
For Diaz, the importance of a wellness coordinator is rooted in the positive impact the position will have on future generations and the responsibility current leaders have to provide students with opportunities to excel.
“When we speak about wellness and wellness instructors, we are talking about our future generation of New Yorkers. These are the people who we want to be the professionals, the mayors, the doctors, and the borough presidents. We need to heal psychologically and heal physically and the least we can do is offer that instruction in our public school system.”
Brewer is focusing on an initiative that she has been advocating since she was a member of the city council . “My main issue is getting social workers into the schools. Yes to wellness but first to social workers. We are not there yet.”
While the morning’s event may have concluded with a discussion of wellness coordinator, something Oddo said earlier in the discussion rang in the audience’s ears:
“Policies matter. Leadership matters. Creativity and out-of-the-box thinking can affect outcomes and can affect lives.”
Again, if you missed the event, you can watch the recording here.